（M = 0.741）. With regard to leisure time allocation shown in Figure 1-5, the interaction failed to reach significance, while the main effect of the prospective/ideal aspects was significant （F（1, 650） = 145.433, p ＜ .001, ηp2 = . 183）, with ideal allocation （M = 2.372） being longer than prospective allocation （M = 1.486）.29Note. Vertical axis represents the time allocation score.Error bars represent standard errorFigure 1-1 Time Allocation to HouseworkFigure 1-3 Time Allocation to Paid WorkFigure 1-5 Time Allocation to LeisureFigure 1-2 Time Allocation to ChildcareFigure 1-4 Time Allocation to Learning
元のページ ../index.html#35